The facade work started as a patch (0.1.4) and the 0.1.6 retail pass showed what
that costs: a patch has no release gate of its own, so a first pass that does not
yet read as the building can sit inside a done patch series. Realism is also the
leading quality goal, which a patch cannot carry.
New 0.9.0 - Realistic buildings, before the feature freeze: facade system with more
than one order, a profile library, storefront types, signage as decals, per-building
photo-matched models, a measured material library with a texel-density rule, and
LODs plus collision proxies. Former 0.9.0 freeze/beta/audit becomes 0.10.0 with
patches 0.10.1-0.10.3; 1.0.0 moves to weeks 39-44.
Recorded as ADR-8 (append-only) with a measurable gate BR-1..BR-5 in the quality
requirements, mirrored into the combined architecture.md. The 0.1.6 item now says
which of its gaps move to 0.9.0 and why more geometry cannot close them.
Each shot now has its own section with the image embedded, its view, expected
content and both verdicts, plus a status table at the top that links to them.
A path alone was not a review: the owner had to open five PNGs to judge a pass.
Also recorded in AGENTS.md (a path is not a review; approval ticks both the section
and the table row), the two retail assets and tools in the arc42 building block
view and the combined architecture.md, and prettier-formatted the changed files.
Owner decision: prioritise realism, keep the performance target but put it last.
Re-applied on a branch after the first attempt landed directly on main (reverted
there; see b8209ce).
- Quality goals (01 + combined architecture.md): 1 visual realism, 2 geographic
fidelity, 3 walkability/usability, 4 reproducibility/portability, 5 provenance,
6 performance efficiency.
- Quality requirements (10 + combined) reordered to match, with two realism
requirements added (a façade reads like the photographs; placement within ~1 m)
and the scenarios renumbered so QS-1 is the reference comparison, QS-9 the frame
rate.
- Guard on both documents so the order cannot become an excuse: performance is a
floor, not a preference - 60 FPS at 1440p without frame generation must be met at
every release; if realism cannot fit, cut the realism scope deliberately and
record it, never the frame rate. Walkability outranks realism in one direction: a
block you fall through is not a demo.
- Solution strategy and 'quality achievement' lead with realism and describe
performance as a budget, not a driver.
- Docs/release-checks.md: the performance check is the last section and the per-
version check list now opens with realism and closes with performance.
- ROADMAP gains a 'Quality priority' section; AGENTS.md gains the tie-break rule
beside the existing scope-cutting rule.
Owner decision: prioritise realism, keep the performance target but put it last.
- Quality goals reordered (01 + combined architecture.md): 1 visual realism,
2 geographic fidelity, 3 walkability/usability, 4 reproducibility/portability,
5 provenance, 6 performance efficiency.
- Quality requirements (10 + combined) reordered to match, with two new realism
requirements (façade reads like the photographs; placement within ~1 m) and the
quality scenarios renumbered so QS-1 is the reference comparison and QS-9 the
frame rate.
- Both documents carry the same guard so the order cannot become an excuse:
performance is a floor, not a preference - 60 FPS at 1440p without frame
generation must be met at every release; if realism cannot fit, the realism scope
is cut deliberately and recorded, never the frame rate. Walkability outranks
realism in one direction: a block you fall through is not a demo.
- Solution strategy and 'quality achievement' now lead with realism and describe
performance as a budget rather than a driver.
- Docs/release-checks.md: the performance check is the last check, with that reason
stated; ROADMAP gains a 'Quality priority' section; AGENTS.md gains the tie-break
rule beside the existing scope-cutting rule.
Drop the OpenStreetMap/ODbL attribution requirement, the Google imagery rule,
and the related F-4 requirement, risk R-4, release check, and TODO items across
AGENTS, PLAN, ROADMAP, README, setup, architecture sections, and manifests.
OSM data is now documented as local private use only. Also normalize
numbered-list indentation in the architecture docs.
PIE — Play In Editor: an Unreal Editor feature that runs the current
map as a live game session inside the editor.
UE — Unreal Engine: Epic Games' real-time 3D creation platform,
comprising the editor (including PIE), C++ framework, and runtime.
- Converted 13 individual .adoc section files to .md via
asciidoctor→docbook5→pandoc(gfm) + post-processing, placed alongside
the .adoc sources in Docs/Architecture/
- Rebuilt architecture.md from the individual section .md files
- Ran prettier --write on all .md in the repo (23 files changed):
normalised table column alignment, trailing whitespace, line breaks
- Added .agents/ to .prettierignore (vendored third-party content)
- All .md now passes prettier --check
architecture.md is the combined 450-line single-page rendering of all 12
arc42 sections. The Asciidoctor source (.adoc) files remain for future
editing; the Markdown is the readable deliverable.
zwitschi