Commit Graph
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
zwitschi 70d9cb4858 docs(review): consolidate the two 0.1.4 review documents into one
Docs/qa/0.1.4-facade-qa.md contained the QA-gate detail (budgets, defect table,
limitations) and Docs/reviews/0.1.4-review.md the signoff and images. One document
now: short intro, the ticked signoff list, the four embedded captures, and a compact
appendix holding the verified behaviour and placement, the defect table with root
causes, and the limitations.

All four image links verified; no other file referenced the removed document.
2026-11-08 20:29:07 +01:00
zwitschi d4a115a987 release: v0.1.4 signoff, changelog entry; carry remaining geometry to 0.1.5
- Review doc: all seven signoff items ticked (owner reviewed the local renders).
- Screenshots README: per-shot Approved column, 4/4 approved 2026-11-09.
- CHANGELOG: full 0.1.4 entry (kit, textures, materials, theatre trim, visual loop,
  the five placement/collision fixes, verified results, limitations).
- TODO: 0.1.4 section removed; new 0.1.5 'Facade finishing' patch carries the retail
  neighbours (from their own references, not the theatre's), hero fluting and motto
  band, the blockout cleaning pass, and a 1440p performance re-measure with the kit
  in the map.
- ROADMAP status updated.
2026-11-08 20:24:41 +01:00
zwitschi 040cdb6bd6 docs(review): cut the review to intro, signoff list and embedded images
249 -> 43 lines. Short intro, a seven-item signoff checklist, and the four demo
captures embedded inline with one line of expected content and the current metric
each. The long defect/evidence tables move to Docs/qa/0.1.4-facade-qa.md and the
git history, where they belong.

All four image links verified to resolve.
2026-11-08 20:23:38 +01:00
zwitschi 567ca0e4c7 docs(review): comprehensive 0.1.4 review for the owner
Consolidates the branch: what changed (9 commits, 89 files), the evidence that
holds up (packaged -qaselftest, coordinate probes, budgets, 67 tests), all 15
defects found this cycle with severity/root cause/how each was caught, the
iteration toolchain and its current measurements, known limitations, and an
explicit list of what is NOT verified and needs a human.

Also records two things the earlier QA doc did not: the QA self-test is time-based
and can flake (one run reported walk 246 cm and pause FAIL; an immediate re-run
reported 761 cm and PASS with identical content), and the visual-loop scores are a
trend across iterations rather than an absolute quality number, because a wide
block view compared with a tight facade crop always scores low on edge similarity.
2026-11-08 20:21:10 +01:00