Commit Graph
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
zwitschi 71c7ca734b docs(arch): realism leads the quality list; performance moves to the end
Owner decision: prioritise realism, keep the performance target but put it last.
Re-applied on a branch after the first attempt landed directly on main (reverted
there; see b8209ce).

- Quality goals (01 + combined architecture.md): 1 visual realism, 2 geographic
  fidelity, 3 walkability/usability, 4 reproducibility/portability, 5 provenance,
  6 performance efficiency.
- Quality requirements (10 + combined) reordered to match, with two realism
  requirements added (a façade reads like the photographs; placement within ~1 m)
  and the scenarios renumbered so QS-1 is the reference comparison, QS-9 the frame
  rate.
- Guard on both documents so the order cannot become an excuse: performance is a
  floor, not a preference - 60 FPS at 1440p without frame generation must be met at
  every release; if realism cannot fit, cut the realism scope deliberately and
  record it, never the frame rate. Walkability outranks realism in one direction: a
  block you fall through is not a demo.
- Solution strategy and 'quality achievement' lead with realism and describe
  performance as a budget, not a driver.
- Docs/release-checks.md: the performance check is the last section and the per-
  version check list now opens with realism and closes with performance.
- ROADMAP gains a 'Quality priority' section; AGENTS.md gains the tie-break rule
  beside the existing scope-cutting rule.
2026-11-08 20:37:32 +01:00
zwitschi b8209ce82b Revert "docs(arch): realism leads the quality list; performance moves to the end"
This reverts commit a1d52aa583.
2026-11-08 20:37:19 +01:00
zwitschi a1d52aa583 docs(arch): realism leads the quality list; performance moves to the end
Owner decision: prioritise realism, keep the performance target but put it last.

- Quality goals reordered (01 + combined architecture.md): 1 visual realism,
  2 geographic fidelity, 3 walkability/usability, 4 reproducibility/portability,
  5 provenance, 6 performance efficiency.
- Quality requirements (10 + combined) reordered to match, with two new realism
  requirements (façade reads like the photographs; placement within ~1 m) and the
  quality scenarios renumbered so QS-1 is the reference comparison and QS-9 the
  frame rate.
- Both documents carry the same guard so the order cannot become an excuse:
  performance is a floor, not a preference - 60 FPS at 1440p without frame
  generation must be met at every release; if realism cannot fit, the realism scope
  is cut deliberately and recorded, never the frame rate. Walkability outranks
  realism in one direction: a block you fall through is not a demo.
- Solution strategy and 'quality achievement' now lead with realism and describe
  performance as a budget rather than a driver.
- Docs/release-checks.md: the performance check is the last check, with that reason
  stated; ROADMAP gains a 'Quality priority' section; AGENTS.md gains the tie-break
  rule beside the existing scope-cutting rule.
2026-11-08 20:37:03 +01:00
zwitschi 5aa883eaff docs: convert all architecture .adoc sections to markdown, prettier-format all .md
- Converted 13 individual .adoc section files to .md via
  asciidoctor→docbook5→pandoc(gfm) + post-processing, placed alongside
  the .adoc sources in Docs/Architecture/
- Rebuilt architecture.md from the individual section .md files
- Ran prettier --write on all .md in the repo (23 files changed):
  normalised table column alignment, trailing whitespace, line breaks
- Added .agents/ to .prettierignore (vendored third-party content)
- All .md now passes prettier --check
2026-11-08 13:33:44 +01:00