Files
gig-line/Geo/manifests/2026-11-06-osm-api-map.md
T
zwitschi 2f87002711 docs(licensing): remove ODbL attribution requirements and HUD credit references
Drop the OpenStreetMap/ODbL attribution requirement, the Google imagery rule,
and the related F-4 requirement, risk R-4, release check, and TODO items across
AGENTS, PLAN, ROADMAP, README, setup, architecture sections, and manifests.
OSM data is now documented as local private use only. Also normalize
numbered-list indentation in the architecture docs.
2026-11-08 14:11:06 +01:00

1.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

OSM extract — Hollywood Blvd block, 2026-11-06

Field Value
Source OpenStreetMap API v0.6, map endpoint (api.openstreetmap.org)
Extract date 2026-11-06 21:45 CET
URL https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/map?bbox=-118.3435,34.1000,-118.3365,34.1030
Data timestamp not reported by this endpoint; the response carries no replication timestamp, so the extract date is the only date available
Bounds west −118.3435, south 34.1000, east −118.3365, north 34.1030 (WGS84)
Extent ≈ 640 m east–west × 333 m north–south
Contents 3565 nodes, 350 ways; streets: Hollywood Blvd (secondary), North Highland Ave (primary), North Orange Dr, North McCadden Pl, North Sycamore Ave, Hawthorn Ave, Walk of Fame footway, service alleys
File Geo/raw/osm-api-map-2026-11-06.osm (1.66 MB, XML)
SHA-256 64615f0db4715c2d50860052e300930c201bbb87e183a1de5985f2d99d83f4e4
CRS in source EPSG:4326 (WGS84 lat/lon)
Local CRS and origin not yet chosen. Candidate EPSG:26911 (NAD83 / UTM zone 11N); origin to be recorded when the QGIS step runs

Why this bbox

It contains the demo block from Highland Avenue to Orange Drive plus the whole north side within 50 m, with enough margin to include the streets' intersection nodes and the alley network behind the south frontage. It deliberately excludes the rest of the boulevard: larger extracts cost processing time.

Coverage limits

  • Building interiors, heights above the tagged value, and pavement widths are not in this data. Treat all of it as layout.
  • The height tag exists on some buildings and is absent on others (6838 has only building:levels, 6922 has neither). A missing tag is not a zero height.
  • The extract has no elevation. The DEM decision is still open; see ROADMAP.md.