Owner decision: prioritise realism, keep the performance target but put it last.
Re-applied on a branch after the first attempt landed directly on main (reverted
there; see b8209ce).
- Quality goals (01 + combined architecture.md): 1 visual realism, 2 geographic
fidelity, 3 walkability/usability, 4 reproducibility/portability, 5 provenance,
6 performance efficiency.
- Quality requirements (10 + combined) reordered to match, with two realism
requirements added (a façade reads like the photographs; placement within ~1 m)
and the scenarios renumbered so QS-1 is the reference comparison, QS-9 the frame
rate.
- Guard on both documents so the order cannot become an excuse: performance is a
floor, not a preference - 60 FPS at 1440p without frame generation must be met at
every release; if realism cannot fit, cut the realism scope deliberately and
record it, never the frame rate. Walkability outranks realism in one direction: a
block you fall through is not a demo.
- Solution strategy and 'quality achievement' lead with realism and describe
performance as a budget, not a driver.
- Docs/release-checks.md: the performance check is the last section and the per-
version check list now opens with realism and closes with performance.
- ROADMAP gains a 'Quality priority' section; AGENTS.md gains the tie-break rule
beside the existing scope-cutting rule.
zwitschi
71c7ca734b