fix(street): taper sidewalk upstand to flush at the building edge

The sidewalk stood the full 0.15 m kerb height above the DEM at *both* edges, so
the outer (building-side) lip was a 15.8 cm ledge where the walk route crossed
from Terrain_DEM onto Sidewalk_South. sidewalk_z now tapers the upstand from full
at the road-side edge to zero at the building-side edge (a ~3-4 % ramp, walkable
and visually negligible).

Pre-check: south max step 20.5 -> 13.4 cm, north 15.1 -> 7.2 cm (the residual
13.4 cm is the crossing-ramp gradient, tracked separately). Street and site
rebuilt, site re-imported (7/7 meshes, collision flags intact), DemoMap rebuilt;
packaged -qaselftest still PASS. README step table updated.

Art/blender/README.md

@@ -80,7 +80,10 @@ LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$B/blender/lib" "$B/blender/blender" -b --factory-startup \
 ```
 
 - `Road_Hollywood`: 8 120 verts, 7 812 faces, carriageway −10.5…+10.5 m, DEM elevations plus a 2 cm lift so it does not z-fight the terrain.
-- `Sidewalk_South` 4.0 m wide, `Sidewalk_North` 5.3 m wide, both raised by the kerb height.
+- `Sidewalk_South` 4.0 m wide, `Sidewalk_North` 5.3 m wide. The kerb upstand is
+  **full at the road-side edge and tapers to zero at the building-side edge**, so
+  the walk surface meets the terrain flush (before `0.1.1` the outer lip stood the
+  full kerb height above the DEM — a 15.8 cm ledge).
 - `Kerb_South`, `Kerb_North`: vertical faces, mostly **0.13 m** — the 0.15 m assumption minus nothing on the road side — and flushed to 0 within ±2.5 m of each signalised crossing with a 1.5 m blend. Measured from the built mesh: 256 steps at 0.13 m, 15 flush, a few in transition.
 
 Crown check on the built mesh at mid-block: gutter −10.5 m → +0.99, −5 m → +1.38, centre → +1.52, +5 m → +1.58, +10.5 m → +1.52. The crown sits just north of the centreline, as the cross-sections said.
@@ -105,13 +108,16 @@ A downward raycast on a 1 m grid along both sidewalks and the designated crossin
 
 | Route             | Samples | Holes | Z range       | Worst step |
 | ----------------- | ------: | ----: | ------------- | ---------: |
-| South sidewalk    |     279 |     0 | −0.45 … +3.13 |    20.5 cm |
-| North sidewalk    |     279 |     0 | +0.07 … +3.83 |    15.1 cm |
-| Crossing at 130 m |      26 |     0 | +1.16 … +1.80 |     8.6 cm |
+| South sidewalk    |     279 |     0 | −0.47 … +3.06 |    13.4 cm |
+| North sidewalk    |     279 |     0 | +0.07 … +3.76 |     7.2 cm |
+| Crossing at 130 m |      26 |     0 | +1.14 … +1.80 |     9.0 cm |
 
 No holes anywhere, so nothing drops the player on either side. The two flagged steps:
 
-- **15.8 cm at s≈207**, where a sample crosses from `Terrain_DEM` onto `Sidewalk_South` — that is the sidewalk's outer edge, the 0.15 m kerb height minus the terrain. Mostly hidden by buildings, but it is a real edge and it will be visible anywhere a building is missing.
+- ~~15.8 cm at s≈207, the sidewalk's outer edge~~ — **fixed in `0.1.1`**: the
+  sidewalk upstand now tapers to zero at the building side, so the outer edge is
+  flush with the terrain. The remaining 13.4 cm max step on the south route is the
+  crossing-ramp gradient below, not the outer edge.
 - **10–13 cm steps at s≈33, 39 and 126**, inside the sidewalk mesh: the kerb-flush transition at the crossings. That is a ~10 % ramp over 1.5 m, steeper than a real crossing ramp (8 % max). Worth grading properly when the crossings are detailed.
 
 This is a pre-check, not the `0.1.0` release check: the release check is traversal in the engine.