Consolidate documentation into architecture and merged guides

docs/3d-model-review.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Blender skill guidance says the targets are, the ranked candidate gaps, and the
 still need the project owner. Nothing here re-opens the accepted 0.9.4 limits by itself.
 
 Related documents: [`npc-visual-review.md`](npc-visual-review.md) (accepted 0.9.4 limits and
-before/after sheets), [`npc-proportion-audit.md`](npc-proportion-audit.md) (proportion guide),
+before/after sheets), [`npc-visual-review.md`](npc-visual-review.md#proportion-audit) (proportion guide),
 [`blender-assets.md`](blender-assets.md) (asset contract), [`asset-tooling.md`](asset-tooling.md)
 (commands).
 
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ severity, explicit verdict) rather than an opinion pass:
 | Look and verdict | `lookdev`, `qa-review` | Day/night beauty captures, ship / ship-with-notes / no-ship verdict |
 
 Project contract and gates stay authoritative; see `AGENTS.md` §Local Blender skills. Blender MCP
-is optional interactive tooling (see [`blender-mcp.md`](blender-mcp.md)); this review's evidence
+is optional interactive tooling (see [`asset-tooling.md#optional-interactive-blender-mcp`](asset-tooling.md#optional-interactive-blender-mcp)); this review's evidence
 came from the headless `tools/blender_assets.py` / `tools/npc_pipeline.py` pipelines plus the
 Godot capture harnesses, so it remains reproducible without MCP.