Reorganize docs into category folders and drop the retired head-review page
Group the top-level docs into docs/project, docs/design, docs/assets and docs/process, each with its own README index. Delete the superseded docs/screens/head-review page and sheets. Rewrite every markdown link, absolute docs path and tool/test reference to the new locations, fix the pre-existing broken anchors and remove the dead Joke Shop photo-board link. check_docs OK, Python tooling 167/167.
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
045ed2a58f
commit
2ba40f3578
57 files changed
+406
-414
No files matched your search
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
"""Keep the 3D model review scorecard honest.
|
||||
|
||||
Every catalogue asset (characters, gear, props) must have a row in
|
||||
`docs/3d-model-review.md`, and the character rows must carry a verdict. This does
|
||||
`docs/assets/3d-model-review.md`, and the character rows must carry a verdict. This does
|
||||
not judge the art; it only fails when an asset is added or renamed without being
|
||||
reviewed, which is how a scorecard silently rots.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ from pathlib import Path
|
||||
import blender_assets as model
|
||||
|
||||
ROOT = Path(model.__file__).resolve().parent.parent
|
||||
REVIEW = ROOT / "docs" / "3d-model-review.md"
|
||||
REVIEW = ROOT / "docs" / "assets" / "3d-model-review.md"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def catalogue_names() -> set[str]:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user